.

Saturday, December 21, 2013

Cja/354 Wk 1 Individual Paper

In the gaffe regarding the FAA vs. cooper it is argued that barrel maker who is a decease pilot and also happens to be human immunodeficiency virus controlling, failed to reveal his health check condition to the federal official Aviation Administration. The argument is that duration Cooper failed to disclose his HIV diagnosis, which he also utilize for affable Security benefits and was approved for long term disablement found on the item that he was HIV positive. In disposition to become a certified aviator, you must gather up a medical certificate. However, the FAA doesnt certify persons with HIV. It is noted that on some(prenominal) occasions, Cooper renewed his certificate with the FAA, but intention drift ensembley withhold his condition. I found this article to be provoke because of the fact that the FAA is able to seclude people who are HIV positive from this line of work. Some would say this is discriminatory, but see how brisk it is to maintain ones he alth for a job that holds an ample bar of responsibility, it certainly makes sense. Another argument which is one that Cooper is exploitation against the FAA, the Department of Transportation, and the Social Security Administration is that they go against the hiding Act of 1974. Since the DOT, which is a parent company for the FAA, provided the SSA with label of pilots who had acquire SSA benefits.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
One of the purposes of the criminal law related to the case is that it was cerebrate that the Government had violated this act but that it was indecipherable as to the actual restitution. It was concluded tha t the actual damages were intellectual and ! excited distress. The Privacy Act does not unequivoc everyy top damages for mental or emotional distress and consequently does not waive the GovĂ‚¬ernments sovereign immunity from obligation for such(prenominal) harms. (2011) As for the sources related to the case; common-law, the Privacy Act of 1974, the federal Aviation Administration, the Department of Transportation, and the Social Security Administration were all relevant sources pertaining to this case....If you want to get a full essay, divert it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.