'Hugh’s character Essay\r'

'The final story, which Hugh tells, incorporates the many criticisms of Hugh’s character. He covers up his own failings and inadequacies as a defence mechanism and reiterates this by saying to Owen, ‘to mean everything is a form of madness. ‘ This story is closely a turning point of Hugh’s character and for the listening’s interruption of his character. Hugh is no longer a two dimensional caricature but a real character with human attributes, hence why we can be searing and admirable towards him.\r\n subsequently completely, Hugh is a self-educated man with a commodious depth of lie withledge of the Classics, speaking four languages, that we know of, Greek, Latin, Gaelic and English; nearly all of which he would collect to have taught himself. He seems to be impelled to share his knowledge. By teaching the Classics in his surroundings of rural poverty, himself a picture of poor crucify countryman, we must appreciate his drive and ability. H ugh also hold the ‘Hedge School’ well as farther as we know.\r\nHe is attempting to educate the locals and one almost feels that he has taken the school from the hedge lines into the boron and still as an old man in his early sixties he has the ambition to run low onward and upward to a new placement at the new national school. He is understandably a figure in the local conjunction who is looked up and rewarded by his peers and students alike. In addition, Yolland has a great deal of respect for him, calling him ” an knowing man. ‘ Yolland almost has more respect for Hugh than Owen does because Owen continues to be critical of him and Yolland repeats, ‘But so astute,’ almost placing Hugh on a pedestal.\r\nIn addition, as an consultation you have to respect his ability to cope with his situation, his wife has died and his sons are with prohibited a mother. It is easy to be critical of Hugh but you have to admire his ability to cope with the hard truthfulness of the times he is living in even so if that means trying to erase the past. After all he did depart in an age of quite a little to mouth existence and he almost blocks out the reality of these hardships. His survival mechanism is a immanent and human instinct. We cannot really blame him for wanting to live in an unrealistic world of Greek allegory and Latin past.\r\nNeither can you chastise his drinking. His life style and the stress of his situation is what drives him to drink and you cannot really gaolbreak him for that. All of these small but simple gestures that Friel incorporates into Hugh’s character are what make us as an audience have admiration for him. Friel does not create a stereotypical character, but a ‘fully-rounded’ single(a) with human qualities, it is these qualities, which allow us as an audience to both admire and criticise his character.\r\n'